The E-anna temple
center at Uruk
E2-an-na
In discussing the origin of Cities, Marc Van de Mieroop (1) says
that Uruk, which gave its name to the Uruk period, was essentially
"the first city in world history." This is not precisely
a statement of its antiquity, as Eridu most likely preceded it
as tradition insists - yet, if we are talking in terms of a seattlement
with a population meeting the criteria for the definition of a
city, Van de Mieroop's statement is solid about Uruk. From early
times, Uruk begain to amass a comparatively large population in
Southern Mesopotamia, owing perhaps to its placement just inland
of the marshs near the head of the Persian gulf: this allowed
for a concentration of fisherman, farmers, gardeners, hunters
and herdsman all of whom were able to specialize in their tasks
and increase productivity because of this sophisticating urban
environment. About the excavation of Uruk, the author tells us
that it is really the only Uruk period center "where there
is meaningful exposure of archaeological remains, allowing us
to reconstruct the physical appearance of the settlement."
Van de Mieroop says this is particularly true of the E-anna precinct
(which
Balage has captured above), because it the precinct was abandoned
in the early 3rd millennium and the author states that this caused
fourth-millennium remains to stay close to the surface. Because
of the increasing level of specialization, and that families were
consequently less self-reliant, organization in the form of divine
authority became very prevalent in Uruk; the temples therefore
were very important components of Urukian society. The author
gives the
following description of the E-anna complex:
"Within an area surrounded by a perimeter
wall, several enormous buildings were in use simultaneously. These
were not only large, in the order of 50 by 80 meters, but also
extensively decorated with a technique that was typical for the
Late Uruk period. Within the walls were stuck clay cones colored
white, black, and red, which formed mosaics in geometrical patterns
on the surface. In one building these cones were of stone, a material
more difficult to obtain in
the region of Uruk than clay."
E-anna as Cultic center
It's noted that these temple buildings were important
cultically as there were collection centers for offerings to the
god's; for more here, please see next
painting titled "Uruk Procession."
E-anna and Uruk as the touchstone
of Administration and writing
Van de Mieroop continues with a discussion of urban life in Uruk
period Southern Mesopotamian; he states that the economy became
so complex that it became necessary to record goods coming into
and going out of the central organization. This led to the emergence
of a specialized group of administrators as the author states:
"In considering the changes in Society, it is important to
realize that all this bureaucratic activity was the domain of
a specialized
group of people." The important results of these developments
that stem noticeably from Uruk are these: a) 'The process of social
differentation culminating in the existence of a stratified society
in which professional occupation primarily determines one's rank
in the hierarchy' and b) WRITING: "This is the first time
in human history that writing was invented (although some scholars
credit this to Egypt), and the first evidence for real script
comes from the
city of Uruk itself. The earliest tablets appear in the Uruk IVa
and III archaeological layers of the Eanna precinct." This
early cuneiform is sometimes referred to as "proto-cuneiform"
and we can therefore say the activities in and around E-anna were
the touchstone of writing and history.
The end of the first E-anna
complex
Information is insufficient here, but towards
the end of the Uruk period we know "the monumental buildings
that dominated the E-anna complex were razed and the entire area
was leveled." However "what happened in Uruk..is hard
to discern."
E-anna
in myth
In earliest times, E-anna was temple of AN the heaven god and
honorary head of the Sumerian pantheon, he was the grandfather
of Inanna. According to myth, the E-anna temple descended from
Heaven, which is concurrent with the legendary divine origin of
the city itself. An example is the following lines from Gilgamesh
and Agga:
"(The city) Uruk, handiwork of the gods,
and (its temple) Eanna, temple descended from heaven....
It is the great gods (themselves who) made
their component parts!"
As the importance of the cult of Inanna grew,
she came to rival An as central deity of the E-anna and although
An was never completely disassociated with the temple, attestations
of Inanna's mythological presence here are far more common in
the literature. Particularly interesting in what is for the most
part an understated cultic rivalry, is the myth "Inanna and
AN". This myth, which is partly fragmented, tells the story
of how Inanna captures
the E-anna from AN and concludes with the lines:
"56-60. She had captured E-ana from An! She
secured it ……. Now Inana speaks of the E-ana as the
house that is the place of the lady. The goddess who has attained
her triumphant position, Inana who has attained her triumphant
position, declares in the good place: "I have captured E-ana
from An."
For more please see the following link: http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.1.3.5#
The White
Temple also known as Anu's Ziggurat
The white temple
Has anyone noticed off in the distance of Balage's painting, A
noticably white colored temple perched on top of a Ziggurat base?
This is a second temple complex in the city of Uruk, and is a
chief feature of a part of the city which, as H. Nissen (2) states,
may possibly be identified with a name known in Mesopotamian myth
and epic: "Kulaba". For examples of Kulaba in myth here
are the following lines from ETCSL:
"Inana the mistress, the lady of the great
powers who allows sexual intercourse in the open squares of Kulaba"
(t.1.1.3)
"Gilgameš, young lord of Kulaba, how
long will you sleep for?"
(t.1.8.1.5)
"when the offices of en and king were famously exercised
at Unug, when the sceptre and staff of Kulaba were held high in
battle -- in battle, Inana's game"
t.1.8.2.1
"When it will be up to us, when we come back
from Aratta, to bring our brother's body to brick-built Kulaba."
t.1.8.2.1
In fact the epics involving the famous kings of Uruk, Gilgamesh,
Enmerker and Lugalbanda, abound with the repeated self-description
"Lord of Kulaba", and Kulaba is mentioned as often as
Uruk (Unug) itself, if not more. So it becomes very interesting
to ask just what is the White Temple or the "Anu Ziggurat"
which was the prominent feature of Kulaba? Nissen explains that
there are three separate structures that can be identified on
the same location
east of E-anna: There is an early archaic structure, a structure
re-built on the original in the late Uruk period, and a still
later structure that was built on the same spot at approx. 300
B.C. (the latter of which we may find less interesting here.)
Regarding the earliest structure, the author describes it as "a
shrine in the form of a temple standing on a high terrace with
steep sides, already existing in the Ubaid period...not only are
the origins of this shrine considerably older than those of the
larger buildings in Eanna, they are older than all other remains
in Eanna... One may regard the western area as the kernel of the
whole great settlement of Uruk." This therefore, may explain
the
reverence still shown to Kulaba in the Urukian epics. Unfortunately,
the theological features of the White temple seem to be somewhat
undetermined at this
time although on somewhat thin contextual evidence it is supposed
to have been a temple of An. This seems particular unclear in
the early examples
unfortunately.
1.Marc Van de Mieroop, A History of the
Ancient Near East (2007)
2. The Early History of the Ancient Near
East, 9000-2000 B.C. Hans Nissen
|